Statistics I · Lecture 1
Instructor: Paulo Fagandini
Main source for course material: Moodle@ISCAL
Official communication channel: 📧 Institutional Email
📖 Gancho Custódio, S. et al. (2022) Números Índices, Edições Sílabo
📖 Murteira, B.; Silva Ribeiro, C.; Andrade e Silva, J. & Pimenta, C., Introdução à Estatística, Escolar Editora, McGraw-Hill, 2010
📖 Ferreira, T., Custódio, S.G. (2023) Modelos Probabilísticos, Edições Sílabo
📖 The making of index numbers. 1st Ed 1922. Irving Fisher.
📖 A Practical Introduction to Index Numbers. 1st Ed 2015. Jeff Ralph, Rob O’Neill, Joe Winton.
📖 Statistics for Business and Economics Global Edition. 10th Ed 2022. Paul Newbold, William Carlson, and Betty Thorne.
This last book is a bit expensive, but it can be rented for less money here.
| Assessment Element | Weight (%) | Duration | Syllabus | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Midterm 1 | 60% | 80 minutes | Topics 1 and 2 | Nov 5th |
| Midterm 2 | 40% | 80 minutes | Topic 3 | Dec 10th |
Each test has a minimum grade of 7.00 (out of 20), not 6.9, not 6.95.
Students may opt, on the day of the Exam, to take an Exam worth 100% of the grade. This Exam will cover Topics 1, 2, and 3.
If you score less than 7.00 in the Midterm, or if you cannot attend the midterm for whatever reason, you will have to do the Comprehensive Exam.
These slides are a free translation and adaptation from the slide deck for Estatística I by Prof. Sandra Custódio and Prof. Teresa Ferreira from the Lisbon Accounting and Business School, Polytechnic University of Lisbon.
Source: Yahoo Finance
| Date | Close |
|---|---|
| 2020 | 132.69 |
| 2021 | 177.57 |
| 2022 | 129.93 |
| 2023 | 192.53 |
| 2024 | 250.42 |
| 2025 | 271.86 |
| 2026 | 333.02 |
Let the close price for Apple be represented by the variable \(y_t\), so \(y_{2020}\) is the close price we got for 2020 (i.e. 132.69).
How much did \(y\) grow between 2020 and 2021?
\[\Delta y_{2021} = y_{2021} - y_{2020} = 177.57 - 132.69\] \[=44.88\]
Or we could say
\[y_{2021} = y_{2020} + \Delta y_{2021}\] \[177.57 = 132.69 + 44.88\]
\[y_{2021}=y_{2020}+\Delta y_{2021}\]
\[y_{2021}=y_{2020}\left(1+\frac{\Delta y_{2021}}{y_{2020}}\right)\]
\[y_{2021}=y_{2020}\left(1+\delta^y_{2021}\right)\]
This, \(\delta_{2021}^y\), is the growth rate of \(y\) at year 2021.
Growth Rate
Let \(y_t\) be a variable that might take different values over time. The growth rate at \(t\) is given by \(\delta_t^y\), and takes a value such that:
\[y_t=y_{t-1}\left(1+\delta_t\right)\]
And then
\[\delta_t = \frac{y_t-y_{t-1}}{y_{t-1}}\]
Note: I dropped \(y\) from the notation in the formula because it is obvious that we are talking about the variable \(y\).
You can write the growth rate as a decimal or as a percentage. If you use decimal notation, consider at least 4 places, if you use percentage you use at least 2. Example: 0.0123 or 1.23%.
Interpretation: What is the percentage change for the variable \(y\) between \(t-1\) and \(t\).
\[177.57 = 132.69+(177.57 - 132.69)\]
\[177.57 =132.69\left(1+\frac{44.88}{132.69}\right)\]
\[177.57=132.69\left(1+0.3382\right)\]
In this case \(\delta_{2021}^y =0.3382 = 33.82\%\).
Interpretation: Between 2020 and 2021, the price for Apple increased 33.82%.
More generally \[\delta_{t+k|t}=\frac{y_{t+k}-y_t}{y_t}\]
Or \[y_{t+k}=y_t(1+\delta_{t+k|t})\]
(homework: Show step by step how you go from one to the other.)
Note: In this case \(\delta_{t+k|t}\) is what percentage the variable changed from \(t\) to \(t+k\), and \(k\) is the number of periods.
We had \(y_{2020}=132.69\), and \(y_{2024} =250.42\). We will try to find \(\delta_{2024|2020}^y\)
\[k=2024-2020=4\]
\[\delta_{2024|2020}^y = \frac{250.42 - 132.69}{132.69} = 0.8873 = 88.73\%\]
For Apple, the stock price grew 88.73% between 2020 and 2024, or the stock price for Apple in 2024 is 88.73% larger than in 2020.
Warning
You should be careful with your interpretation and use of this cumulative growth rate, because it does not mean that \(y\) grew \(\delta_{t+k|t}^y\) per period between \(t\) and \(t+k\).
Average Growth Rate
Let \(y_t\) be a variable that might take different values over time. The average growth rate between \(t\) and \(t+k\) is given by \(\overline{\delta}_{t+k|t}^y\), and takes a value such that:
\[y_{t+k}=y_t\left(1+\overline{\delta}_{t+k|t}\right)^k\]
We will use something called the geometric mean.
I dropped \(y\) from the notation in the formula because it is obvious that we are talking about the variable \(y\).
Let’s start with \(y_t\)… and the traditional growth rates \(\delta_t\):
\[y_{t+1} = y_t(1+\delta_{t+1})\]
\[y_{t+2} = y_{t+1}(1+\delta_{t+2})\]
\[y_{t+3} = y_{t+2}(1+\delta_{t+3})\]
Can we write \(y_{t+2}\) as a function of \(y_t\)?
\[y_{t+2} = y_{t+1}(1+\delta_{t+2}) = y_{t}(1+\delta_{t+1})(1+\delta_{t+2})\]
And \(y_{t+3}\)?
\[y_{t+3} = y_{t}(1+\delta_{t+1})(1+\delta_{t+2})(1+\delta_{t+3})\]
Generalizing
\[y_{t+k}=y_t (1+\delta_{t+1})...(1+\delta_{t+k-1})(1+\delta_{t+k})\]
When computing the average growth rate, we are trying to find \(\overline{\delta}\) such that if the growth rate was the same every period, it would have taken \(y_t\) to the value of \(y_{t+k}\) all the same:
\[y_{t+k}=y_t(1+\overline{\delta})(1+\overline{\delta})...(1+\overline{\delta})\]
How many times is \((1+\overline{\delta})\) multiplied in the expression?
\[y_{t+k} = y_t \left(1+\overline{\delta}\right)^k\]
\[\frac{y_{t+k}}{y_t} = \left(1+\overline{\delta}\right)^k\]
\[\left(\frac{y_{t+k}}{y_t}\right)^{1/k} = \left(1+\overline{\delta}\right)\]
\[\left(\frac{y_{t+k}}{y_t}\right)^{1/k} - 1 = \overline{\delta}\]
\[\overline{\delta}_{t+k|t}=\left(\frac{y_{t+k}}{y_t}\right)^{1/k} - 1\]
We had \[\delta_{2024|2020}^y = \frac{250.42 - 132.69}{132.69} = 0.8873 = 88.73\%\]
But what now is the average growth rate between 2020 and 2024?
Remember \(k = 4\)
\[ \overline{\delta} = \left(\frac{250.42}{132.69}\right)^{1/4} - 1 \approx 0.1721= 17.21\% \]
Interpretation: On average, between 2020 and 2023 \(y\) grew 17.21% every year.
Note that \[ (1+17.21\%)^4 = (1+0.1721)^4 \approx 1.8873\approx 1 + 88.73\% \]
A variable grows 10% in one year and then falls 10% in the next. Over the two years together it:
A. fell 1%
B. rose 1%
C. is unchanged
D. fell 10%
✅ A. Growth rates compound, they do not add: \((1+0.1)(1-0.1)=0.99\), so the variable ends 1% below where it started.
A variable goes from 100 to 150 over 5 years. Its average growth rate is closest to:
A. 10%
B. 8.45%
C. 50%
D. 5%
✅ B. \(\overline{\delta}=\left(\frac{150}{100}\right)^{1/5}-1=1.5^{0.2}-1\approx 0.0845\), that is 8.45% per year.
A firm sold 240 units in 2020 and 300 units in 2023.
Compute:
(i) the cumulative growth rate over the three years;
(ii) the average annual growth rate.
(i) \(\delta_{2023|2020}=\frac{300-240}{240}=0.25\), a cumulative 25%.
(ii) Here \(k=3\), so \(\overline{\delta}=\left(\frac{300}{240}\right)^{1/3}-1=1.25^{1/3}-1\approx 0.0772\), about 7.72% per year.
Note 7.72% per year for 3 years is not 25/3, precisely because growth compounds.
Which stock would you have purchased in 2016-10-03?
What’s the important question here?
Which one grew more! For this, levels are not as relevant as their evolution over time.
For example, say we have prices for two stocks A and B. Say we want to hold these stocks for only one period, which one would choose to invest your hard earned 💵?
How many stocks will you be able to buy of each stock, if their prices are \(a_t\) and \(b_t\), and you have US$1000?
\(n_a=\frac{1000}{a_t}\) of stock A and \(n_b=\frac{1000}{b_t}\) of stock \(B\). Note that \(n_a\) and \(n_b\) are the amount of stock you can buy of each.
Now is a new day 🌄! Prices are now \(a_{t+1}\) and \(b_{t+1}\), how much is your portfolio worth today?
If you bought stock A: \(a_{t+1} n_a = a_{t+1}\frac{1000}{a_t}\)
If you bought stock B: \(b_{t+1} n_b = b_{t+1}\frac{1000}{b_t}\)
Note that the 1000 is fixed, so it is just what we invested, it is not going to change anything in our decision on buying A vs B, what is really important is \(\frac{a_{t+1}}{a_t}\) and \(\frac{b_{t+1}}{b_t}\), that is the growth rate of prices for each stock, as
\[\frac{a_{t+1}}{a_t}=1+\delta_{t+1}^a \quad\text{and}\quad \frac{b_{t+1}}{b_t}=1+\delta_{t+1}^b\]
You did not sell and…
Now is (another) new day 🌄! Prices are now \(a_{t+2}\) and \(b_{t+2}\), how much is your portfolio worth today?
If you bought stock A: \(a_{t+2} n_a = a_{t+2}\frac{1000}{a_t}\)
If you bought stock B: \(b_{t+2} n_b = b_{t+2}\frac{1000}{b_t}\)
blah, blah…
\[\frac{a_{t+2}}{a_t}=1+\delta_{t+2}^a \quad\text{and}\quad \frac{b_{t+2}}{b_t}=1+\delta_{t+2}^b\]
If we wait two days, we only care how is the price today compared to when we made the purchase. We could make instead a plot of \(1+\delta_{t+k}\) to see which grew more!
Now we have a much clear picture. We can compare their evolution starting in 2016-10-03.
What can you read from the plot?
Note that for 2016-10-03, we would have, for A and B:
\[1+\frac{a_t-a_t}{a_t}=1\quad\text{and}\quad 1+\frac{b_t-b_t}{b_t}=1\]
We just built and index number!
By convention though, instead of using 1 for the reference date, we will use 100 (as in 100%) for the reference day (we will put a name to this in a few moments).
When our new series was 2, we understood that \(1+\delta_{t+k}=2\) or \(\delta_{t+k}=1\), i.e. the price grew 100%, or doubled! Now, with the new notation, we would have that the new series would take the value of 200, i.e. the price is now 200% the value it had at our initial date.
Index Number
An Index Number is a scaled variable that takes as a reference point the value an underlying variable took at a fixed point in time. Say, for an underlying variable \(x_t\) we build an index \(I_t\).
\[I_t=\frac{x_t}{x_0}\times 100\]
Where \(x_t\) is the value the underlying variable takes at time \(t\), and \(x_0\) represents the value this variable took at our reference point. This period is called base.
Note: In this case we used time as the dimension for \(t\) but this needs not be the case, we will see examples later.
In our previous example, the base day would have been 2016-10-03. Note that in the base period \[I_0=\frac{x_0}{x_0}\times 100 = 100\]
Index Numbers are defined by their underlying variable. This can change over time, or it can change according to another dimension, like geography, or both! We will see examples.
Also, an Index Number can have a fixed base or a moving base.
Index Numbers
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Simple | Single stock price |
| Composite | SP500 (market index), CPI |
| Fixed Base | GDP, CPI, market index |
| Rolling Base | Some measures of GDP, Commodities Futures |
| Chronological | Stock price over time, CPI, GDP |
| Geographical | BigMac Index |
Importantly, an index number is no bueno to reflect the level of a variable, but its evolution or relative value against a base.